Comedy Central said last week that it will stream the comedy triumvirate of “The Daily Show,” “The Colbert Report,” and “South Park,” in their entirety, on Fancast.com. (Silly name, but whatever.) Beyond the “wow, neat” reaction, there’s something else going on here that we already hinted at a few days ago: what if people, seeing […]

Comedy Central stated last week that it will stream the comedy triumvirate of “The Daily Show,” “The Colbert Report,” and “South Park,” in their entirety, on Fancast.com. (Silly name, but whatever.) Beyond the “wow, neat” reaction, there’s something else going on here that we already hinted at a few days ago: what if people, seeing all there favorite shows move online—”The Daily Show” was required viewing in my college—refuse to pay for cable Television? Looking closer, you see that some cable companies might be hurt more than others.

Take Comcast, the ISP everyone on the internet hates. It won’t be hurt too much, especially by this particular Comedy Central deal, because it owns Fancast.com. Either it will make money from dealing with Viacom (which owns Comedy Central) and showing its programming on Television, or from Fancast.com. Comcast gets paid either way.

Not so with Time Warner, my cable company. Once viewers realize that they can watch Stephen Colbert state “truthiness” 500 times a week and still laugh for free on the web, what sense does it make to subscribe to Time Warner? And from TW’s perspective, what sense does it make for it to pay full price—”top dollar,” as the kids might say—for Stewart, Colbert and Cartman when not as many eyeballs will be watching?

States Time Warner:

They can’t have it both ways. If they put content they ask cable companies to pay for on the web for free, they’re making it less valuable and we should be expected to pay less for it

Or, more succinctly:

Guess what? We do mind [that more and more content is going online].

Keep in mind that I’m not even speaking about pirated content, since that’s a while different topic, and one that I know a thing or two about. We’re speaking legitimately free TV content on the internet possibly being at the expense of the cable companies.

Isn’t the World wide web exciting?

Via [crunchgear]

Share This

Share This

The brain-machine interface is one of the next major steps in technology. I had the privilege to study Neuroscience at UCLA and can say with certainty that we’re nowhere near a practical application for a number of reasons, but the amount of brainpower being devoted to the subject is so great that we’re making great […]

The brain-machine interface is one of the next major steps in technology. I had the privilege to study Neuroscience at UCLA and can say with certainty that we’re nowhere near a practical application for a number of reasons, but the amount of brainpower being devoted to the subject is so great that we’re making great strides year by year. We’re miniaturizing and automating microelectrodes, we’re creating serviceable bionic eyes, and now we’re making prosthetics that begin to approach our original limbs in strength and dexterity. And who’s behind it? Dean Kamen, of course, who has done a lot more than make an pricey scooter if you’re not aware.

Oh and in case you missed it, in similar news they’ve some monkeys controlling robot arms with their minds. Hello, end of humanity!

Via [crunchgear]

Share This

Share This

You know what, I get the feeling that this World wide web thing is going to be massive. I hear you can trade pictures with friends in far away lands. And the idea of real time stocks without having to turn on CNN is awesome. I’ve got a buddy at the school that has the whole campus […]

You know what, I get the feeling that this World wide web thing is going to be large. I hear you can trade pictures with friends in far away lands. And the idea of real time stocks without having to turn on CNN is awesome. I’ve got a buddy at the school that has the whole campus wired high speed style. No dial-up! So awesome.

Via [crunchgear]

Share This

Share This